As well as beguiling
landscapes, flower painting was another genre that Marie Spartali successfully
pursued throughout her career, images which contrast with the delicacy of much of her
work by being, in the words of a contemporary, ‘forcible and decisive’ – terms that
are seldom applied either to her work or to flower painting in general.
As more or less the
lowest genre of art, flower painting has been consistently disregarded and dismissed,
except when it appears in seventeenth century Dutch examples, or in works by
Van Gogh. But down the centuries flowers
have been among the most popular of subjects and certainly one that appealed to
women artists who had less access to travel, to professional models, fully
equipped studios or wealthy patrons.
As flowers droop,
fade and drop their petals very swiftly, flower painting requires a special set
of skills which often go unremarked. In the
1860s Marie Spartali’s father bought at least one still life from Henri Fantin
Latour which is now in the Metropolitan Museum.
Showing lilac blossom and white stocks in a black vase, alongside apples
and pears – an unseasonable combination – this rather stiff piece may have inspired Marie when in
the mid-1870s she sent several flower pieces for exhibition, in the UK and
US. They included a group of
chrysanthemums and hellebore; pairings of roses and lilac, roses and lilies, roses
and honeysuckle; and two wild flower subjects, ranunculae (either celandine or buttercups)
and kingcups with blackthorn.
All are apparently
untraced; the flower paintings that are
known and thus available for exhibition at Delaware Art Museum seem to date
from much later in Marie’s career. As they
remain in family possession they may have been done for her own satisfaction
rather than for sale, a guess that is supported by the fact that several are
undated. We have chosen subjects
reflecting spring, summer and autumn, and they add a vigorous, colourful dimension
to her oeuvre.
CATALOGUE DETAILS HERE
CATALOGUE DETAILS HERE